Microsoft Forms Alternative: Makerble Vs. Microsoft Forms

Case Management

  • Microsoft Forms is not a case management tool.

  • This means that in order to use Microsoft Forms, you have to maintain a separate system to manage your day to day work with clients, beneficiaries and stakeholders

  • If you want to use surveys to understand your impact, you will have to copy & paste some data between your spreadsheet and Microsoft Forms.

  • This is inefficient, takes up precious time and is susceptible to human error.

Distance Travelled

  • Microsoft Forms is designed to give you a show you the results from a single survey campaign. It is not designed to compare individual people’s survey results over time.

  • On Makerble, every respondent has a profile

  • This means that Makerble can automatically detect their pre-programme, mid-programme and post-programme responses to each question and instantly report the improvement over time for each individual beneficiary but also for the cohort as a whole


There are no insights beyond the questions in your survey

  • Microsoft Forms only looks at the answers to survey questions

  • It does not take into account the operational information you have about your beneficiaries

  • Because you cannot cross-reference your survey data with your operational data, it means that you miss out on valuable insights.

Example

  • If you are a therapy nonprofit, your case management system shows the demographic makeup of your clients and the number of sessions they attend. By cross-referencing this with your client’s survey results (which you can do in Makerble), you could see that:

    • people who attend between 5 & 10 sessions tend to be those that see the biggest improvement

    • Black girls aged from 14 to 17 tend to underperform versus the average

    • Everyone who is counselled by Therapist X tends to see a bigger change over time


Those kinds of insights that tell you about the audiences you're under-serving are only possible when you're able to cross-reference survey responses with operational data about how often you see people, who sees them, demographic details about those people, who referred them, etc.

Conclusion

  • Whilst Microsoft Forms is a powerful surveys tool, it stops at surveys.

  • Whereas on Makerble you will get the context that helps you understand your survey results

ZOHO Forms Alternative: Makerble Vs. ZOHO Forms

Case Management

  • ZOHO Forms is not a case management tool.

  • This means that in order to use ZOHO Forms, you have to maintain a separate system to manage your day to day work with clients, beneficiaries and stakeholders

  • If you want to use surveys to understand your impact, you will have to copy & paste some data between your spreadsheet and ZOHO Forms.

  • This is inefficient, takes up precious time and is susceptible to human error.

Distance Travelled

  • ZOHO Forms is designed to give you a show you the results from a single survey campaign. It is not designed to compare individual people’s survey results over time.

  • On Makerble, every respondent has a profile

  • This means that Makerble can automatically detect their pre-programme, mid-programme and post-programme responses to each question and instantly report the improvement over time for each individual beneficiary but also for the cohort as a whole


There are no insights beyond the questions in your survey

  • ZOHO Forms only looks at the answers to survey questions

  • It does not take into account the operational information you have about your beneficiaries

  • Because you cannot cross-reference your survey data with your operational data, it means that you miss out on valuable insights.

Example

  • If you are a therapy nonprofit, your case management system shows the demographic makeup of your clients and the number of sessions they attend. By cross-referencing this with your client’s survey results (which you can do in Makerble), you could see that:

    • people who attend between 5 & 10 sessions tend to be those that see the biggest improvement

    • Black girls aged from 14 to 17 tend to underperform versus the average

    • Everyone who is counselled by Therapist X tends to see a bigger change over time


Those kinds of insights that tell you about the audiences you're under-serving are only possible when you're able to cross-reference survey responses with operational data about how often you see people, who sees them, demographic details about those people, who referred them, etc.

Conclusion

  • Whilst ZOHO Forms is a powerful surveys tool, it stops at surveys.

  • Whereas on Makerble you will get the context that helps you understand your survey results

Typeform Alternative: Makerble Vs. Typeform

Typeform is an online form builder that helps users build and manage forms.

Case Management

  • Typeform is not a case management tool.

  • This means that in order to use Typeform, you have to maintain a separate system to manage your day to day work with clients, beneficiaries and stakeholders

  • If you want to use surveys to understand your impact, you will have to copy & paste some data between your spreadsheet and Typeform.

  • This is inefficient, takes up precious time and is susceptible to human error.

Distance Travelled

  • Typeform is designed to give you a show you the results from a single survey campaign. It is not designed to compare individual people’s survey results over time.

  • On Makerble, every respondent has a profile

  • This means that Makerble can automatically detect their pre-programme, mid-programme and post-programme responses to each question and instantly report the improvement over time for each individual beneficiary but also for the cohort as a whole


There are no insights beyond the questions in your survey

  • Typeform only looks at the answers to survey questions

  • It does not take into account the operational information you have about your beneficiaries

  • Because you cannot cross-reference your survey data with your operational data, it means that you miss out on valuable insights.

Example

  • If you are a therapy nonprofit, your case management system shows the demographic makeup of your clients and the number of sessions they attend. By cross-referencing this with your client’s survey results (which you can do in Makerble), you could see that:

    • people who attend between 5 & 10 sessions tend to be those that see the biggest improvement

    • Black girls aged from 14 to 17 tend to underperform versus the average

    • Everyone who is counselled by Therapist X tends to see a bigger change over time


Those kinds of insights that tell you about the audiences you're under-serving are only possible when you're able to cross-reference survey responses with operational data about how often you see people, who sees them, demographic details about those people, who referred them, etc.

Conclusion

  • Whilst Typeform is a powerful surveys tool, it stops at surveys.

  • Whereas on Makerble you will get the context that helps you understand your survey results

Google Forms Alternative: Makerble Vs. Google Forms

Google Forms is part of Google suit which lets you create forms online

Case Management

  • Google Forms is not a case management tool.

  • This means that in order to use Google Forms, you have to maintain a separate system to manage your day to day work with clients, beneficiaries and stakeholders

  • If you want to use surveys to understand your impact, you will have to copy & paste some data between your spreadsheet and Google Forms.

  • This is inefficient, takes up precious time and is susceptible to human error.

Distance Travelled

  • Google Forms is designed to give you a show you the results from a single survey campaign. It is not designed to compare individual people’s survey results over time.

  • On Makerble, every respondent has a profile

  • This means that Makerble can automatically detect their pre-programme, mid-programme and post-programme responses to each question and instantly report the improvement over time for each individual beneficiary but also for the cohort as a whole


There are no insights beyond the questions in your survey

  • Google Forms only looks at the answers to survey questions

  • It does not take into account the operational information you have about your beneficiaries

  • Because you cannot cross-reference your survey data with your operational data, it means that you miss out on valuable insights.

Example

  • If you are a therapy nonprofit, your case management system shows the demographic makeup of your clients and the number of sessions they attend. By cross-referencing this with your client’s survey results (which you can do in Makerble), you could see that:

    • people who attend between 5 & 10 sessions tend to be those that see the biggest improvement

    • Black girls aged from 14 to 17 tend to underperform versus the average

    • Everyone who is counselled by Therapist X tends to see a bigger change over time


Those kinds of insights that tell you about the audiences you're under-serving are only possible when you're able to cross-reference survey responses with operational data about how often you see people, who sees them, demographic details about those people, who referred them, etc.

Conclusion

  • Whilst Google Forms is a powerful surveys tool, it stops at surveys.

  • Whereas on Makerble you will get the context that helps you understand your survey results

Exploring Brand Impact: A Comprehensive Three-tiered Assessment

Measuring the impact of branding involves dissecting its influence across three crucial levels, providing a deeper understanding of its effects on consumer perceptions, behaviors, and business outcomes.

Firstly, there's the realm of how individuals perceive a brand. It's all about brand recall—what sticks in someone's mind when they think about a brand. This before-and-after comparison allows us to gauge how branding changes have altered consumer perceptions, reflecting the effectiveness of the rebranding strategy.

Moving beyond perception, the second level delves into behavioral changes among stakeholders. Internally, it could mean shifts in staff behaviors and company culture. Externally, it's about observing changes in consumer habits or increased engagement from other stakeholders. Benchmarking these behaviors before and after the rebrand provides tangible evidence of the branding's impact on actions and engagements over time.

Lastly, there's the tangible business impact. This involves assessing direct effects on revenue, market expansion, or reaching new customer segments. Although attributing all success solely to branding can be complex, observing increased revenue streams or market penetration post-rebrand indicates the branding's significant business impact.

Understanding the attribution of success in branding impact is essential. While it's challenging to credit all changes solely to branding, utilizing this three-tiered approach allows us to showcase the role of branding in these transformations.

When discussing potential rebranding projects with clients, employing these three levels offers a comprehensive view of the potential impact. By illustrating the cognitive, behavioral, and business alterations brought about by successful branding endeavors, clients can envision the significant changes that a rebrand or brand refresh could bring to their business.

Perspective Providers: Phone Number Search and Survey Capability

Perspective Providers: Phone Number Search and Survey Capability

Introducing a functionality that enables users to effortlessly add Perspective Providers on the contact's profile page under the Perspectives From tab and on the Send Surveys to Perspective Providers page by searching for their phone numbers, automatically creating new contacts with accurate details, and facilitating survey distribution through their phone numbers.